Evaluating Truth and Validity Exercise Essay Example for Free

Evaluating Truth and Validity Exercise Es learnAll phantasmal authorities argon implicated about the dangers of nuclear war. All politicians are concerned about the dangers of nuclear war. Therefore, either politicians are ghostly authorities. This course is in logical because of devil reasons. First it is an overgeneralization. How can someone actually learn that all ghostlike authorities are concerned about the dangers of nuclear war or all politicians are concerned about nuclear war? Has anyone polled all unearthly authorities or politicians? There can be a very few religious authorities that might think it leave alone never happen, so there is no reason to be concerned about it, or there could also perchance be a small religious faction that imagines that nuclear war will get unblock of all the evil in the world and is Gods way of cleansing the world. The same can be verbalize for politicians.Maybe there are a few that would want to start a war because of thei r egoistic motives. One can argue that there are politicians in Syria and Iran that would love to bomb the U.S and Israel. Nothing was verbalize about the politician having to be from this country. The second reason is that it is an illogical conclusion. One can non grade that dependable because politicians and religious authorities share the same concerns that they will become one in the same. They just share one interest. It takes more than caring about nuclear war to become a religious authority. Religious authorities must go through a process that usually takes years of religious education, and practice. There are certain instances, of course, where some politicians are religious authorities also however that is not predicated on the fact that they share the same view on one certain issue.If the Social protective cover system is further weakened, the fourth-year will take away to fear pauperisation. Therefore, if the Social protection system is not further weakened, th e elderly will not have to fear poverty. This is anovergeneralization and an illogical conclusion. It is true that if the Social Security system is further weakened, the some of the elderly will have to fear poverty, but not all of the elderly. roughly elderly people are very wealthy. Other elderly people have family members who have made arrangements to take care of them and their financial needs. Of course, there will be a lot of elderly that will fear poverty without the social certification checks they would be receiving once a month. Because of these reasons the origin is an overgeneralization. The argument is also an illogical conclusion because some people regardless of their social security will unflurried be in poverty.Some people do not have a significant choke history to receive a lot of money from the social security department. According to the social security department website, the average check for a retired worker is $1,294 a month. (Office, 2014) According to the United States Government the poverty level for a family of one is $980.83. (federal official Register, 2015) What must be taken into consideration is that some recipients will be well below the average social security check, and some will be well above. Those that are well below the average will be in poverty if that is all they are receiving. This argument does not account for the elderly that will not even receive a social security. They will have to fear poverty regardless of how weak or strong the social security is.The anti-abortionists say that the fetus is human, but they have not proved it. Therefore, they have no reasonable basis for opposing abortion. This argument is invalid because of at least two reasons. The first reason it is not a valid argument is because it has been proven that the fetus is human after eight months. How could it not be human if it comes from two persons who have intercourse and conceive a fetus? This is the definition of a fetus according to M erriam-Webster an unhatched or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind specifically a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth. In this argument, there is no mention as to how soon after conception the fetus becomes a human. Could the argument still be valid if it were eight months after conception? Another reason this is an illegitimate argument is that the argument wants a person to think that theonly reason antiabortionist rival abortions is because the fetus is human.There are antiabortionists who have numerous reasons why they feel abortion is wrong. Some of the most popular reasons why some people oppose abortion are because of morality. They believe that the fetus is a human the minute it is conceived. Some people believe it to be divine intervention from God and humans do not have the right to go against Gods desires and plan. Many of these people are very religious in faith and to them it does not ma tter when doctors say the baby goes from being an egg to a human fetus.Another reason people oppose abortions is because of the synthetic rubber of the person having the abortion. Some people feel it is an unnecessary risk to a womans health. Many women have died from complications presently resulting from abortions. Internal hemorrhaging is not very uncommon. Some women have indirect complications such as depression and anxiety. Some women have even committed suicide because of their mental health issues after having an abortion. For these several reasons, this argument is illegitimate.ReferencesFederal Register (2015) (Accessed 21 April 2015).fetus a human being or animal in the posterior stages of development before it is born (no date). (Accessed 21 April 2015). Office, P. (2014) Social Security Administration Social Security elemental Facts. (Accessed 21 April 2015). Ruggiero, V. R. (2012) The Art of Thinking, a guide to critical and creative thought (10th ed.). New York, NY Pearson